"The strength of Calfee is that they have really good subject matter expertise. The firm provides excellent service and high-quality advice."
Client quote, Chambers USA
Overview
Antitrust and competition issues affect every business that prices its goods, sells to customers, and interacts with competitors. Not understanding the federal and state competition laws that govern a company's conduct can result in expensive and time-consuming investigations and litigation. Calfee’s competition and antitrust attorneys have for decades counseled clients on the antitrust issues impacting their operations so they can prudently achieve their business goals.
We advise our clients regularly on antitrust issues affecting their everyday operations such as pricing and distribution, employee education and compliance, mergers and acquisitions, and antitrust litigation ranging from smaller disputes to complex antitrust class actions. Our work has assisted clients in industries including manufacturing, retail and consumer goods, food and beverage, automotive parts, health care, chemicals, and real estate. Because understanding competition risks requires detailed knowledge of the marketplace in which a business operates, we learn the details, and we work with our colleagues across the spectrum of Calfee’s practice areas, to ensure our clients are provided cost-effective, responsive, and practical advice.
Our antitrust lawyers regularly represent public and private companies on antitrust matters in every procedural context – before the Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Department of Justice, and in state and federal courts in complex civil and criminal litigation.
We provide counseling and litigation services in the areas of competitor and customer relations, pricing policies, dealer relations, Hart-Scott-Rodino compliance, joint venture/acquisition analysis, advertising, and franchising. Our antitrust attorneys have extensive experience designing and implementing antitrust compliance programs for clients. Calfee designs antitrust compliance programs that will assist its clients in meeting the standards of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines and thus potentially serve as a mitigating factor in criminal sentencing.
From our antitrust and trade regulation counseling and litigation capabilities to antitrust and competition compliance services, our guidance in the competition realm is always tailored to our clients' needs.
Services
Corporate Counseling
- Merger and acquisition analysis and filings
- Joint venture evaluation and structuring
- Development and enforcement of pricing policies
- Antitrust compliance programming
- Intellectual property restrictions
- Robinson-Patman Act
- Dealer terminations
Government Enforcement
- Department of Justice civil investigations
- Federal merger investigations
- Grand Jury investigations
- FTC and State enforcement proceedings
Private Litigation
- Price fixing
- Monopolization
- Price discrimination
- Tying arrangements
- Refusals to deal and boycotts
- Market allocations
Noteworthy
Chambers USA Leading Law Firm Rankings
Since 2021, Calfee has been recognized by Chambers USA as a Leading Law Firm in Antitrust, most recently in Band 2 in Ohio (2024).
Clients interviewed by Chambers USA researchers stated, "The strength of Calfee is that they have really good subject matter expertise. The firm provides excellent service and high-quality advice. Their lawyers are very good."
Litigation practice Co-Chair and leader of the firm's Antitrust and Antitrust and Trade Regulation Counseling and Litigation practice groups, Maura L. Hughes, has been recognized as a Leading Lawyer in Antitrust Law by Chambers USA, most recently in Band 1 in Ohio (2024). Clients interviewed by Chambers USA researchers described Maura Hughes as "well respected in the Antitrust Bar; she provides practical advice and is extremely smart. She is a trusted adviser."
Best Lawyers® “Best Law Firms” Rankings
Calfee was selected for inclusion in the 2025"Best Law Firms" rankings in Antitrust (Regional Tier 2 Cleveland) and Litigation - Antitrust (National Tier 3, Regional Tier 1 Cleveland).
Professionals
Professionals
Experience
Experience
Representative Antitrust Clients
- American Greetings Corporation
- Continental AG (OTC: CTTAF)
- Invacare Corporation (NYSE: IVC)
- The J. M. Smucker Company (NYSE: SJM)
- Linsalata Capital Partners
- RPM International Inc. (NYSE: RPM)
- Tarkett (OTC: TKFTF)
Representative Antitrust Matters
- Continental Automotive Systems, Inc., Continental Automotive Korea Ltd., Continental Automotive Electronics LLC (OTC: CTTAF) — (GEICO Corporation, et al. v. Aisan Industry Co., Ltd., et al., U.S. District Ct., E.D. Michigan, 2:18-cv-12210) Calfee represented a U.S. subsidiary and two Korean subsidiaries of Continental AG in this antitrust action alleging that GEICO and eight of its subsidiaries are entitled to damages for antitrust price fixing and bid-rigging violations, as well as violations of state law, in the automotive industry. The plaintiffs opted out of class action settlements in connection with more than 40 different automotive parts cases. Calfee represented the Continental defendants in connection with the sale of instrument panel clusters.
- Continental Automotive Systems, Inc., Continental Automotive Electronics LLC, Continental Automotive Korea Ltd. (OTC: CTTAF) — (In Re Instrument Panel Clusters; Group 1 Automotive, Inc. et al. v. Denso Corp., et al., U.S. Dist. Ct, ED Mich., Case No. 2:170cv-12030) This antitrust litigation alleges violations of the Sherman Act including price fixing and bid rigging in connection with the sale of automotive parts. Calfee is lead counsel for two foreign and one U.S. subsidiary of Continental AG. Plaintiffs are assignees of over 100 automobile dealers who allegedly paid inflated prices for the purchase of automobiles due to the illegal conduct of the defendants.
Calfee’s Antitrust Attorneys Have Extensive Litigation and Regulatory Experience
- Represented a first-tier automotive supplier in multi-district antitrust class action litigation alleging horizontal cartel activity, including multiple class actions.
- Counselled a nationally recognized manufacturer of luxury consumer goods in restructuring its marketing and distribution systems and cooperative advertising programs and successfully defended the manufacturer in a Justice Department investigation of its programs.
- Represented a nationally recognized manufacturer and retailer in connection with an industry-wide investigation of competitive effects on retail pricing of certain labeling practices.
- Successfully defended a leading steel container manufacturer in multi-district, treble-damage, price-fixing class actions and in a parallel federal grand jury investigation based in Chicago.
- Advised intellectual property clients with respect to possible antitrust implications of field of use restrictions in licensing agreements, as well as the antitrust implications of computer standard setting.
- Routinely counsel clients on Hart-Scott-Rodino pre-merger notification requirements, prepare and administer filings, and present issues to the Federal Trade Commission and Justice Department enforcement staff in support of the transaction.
- Represented a regional healthcare institution in connection with the Federal Trade Commission’s investigation of and efforts to enjoin its acquisition by a competing hospital system.
Antitrust Compliance
Antitrust Compliance
The high stakes associated with antitrust laws make a compliance program critical to manage and minimize your company’s antitrust risks. Violations can lead to criminal convictions, prison sentences and corporate fines, and civil awards in the tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars. Antitrust investigations – even if successfully defended – cost businesses time and resources. In addition to all these risks, antitrust violations can impact severely a company’s reputation. An effective compliance program can not only prevent serious violations but also root out cartel activity at an early stage, which could assist a company in taking advantage of leniency rules for early reporting to U.S. and foreign antitrust authorities.
Calfee has extensive experience designing and implementing antitrust compliance programs for clients in a variety of industries, addressing both in-house counsel and business teams. Calfee designs antitrust compliance programs that will assist its clients in meeting the standards of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines so that they can be deemed “effective” and thus potentially serve as a mitigating factor in criminal sentencing. These programs address the risks your employees face in areas as varied as competitor relations, purchasing and distribution policies, pricing practices, trade association activity, mergers and acquisitions, and other concerns.
Because the potential risks depend significantly on the specific market environment of your business, our antitrust compliance programs are tailored to the unique circumstances of your company, including the business size, products and market position. We educate your employees as to the risks arising from seemingly harmless interactions in the marketplace. Our goal is to help you achieve your business goals while minimizing your antitrust risks.
Antitrust Compliance Risks
Some of the most serious antitrust compliance risks include the following:
- Per se violations of the Sherman Act, including price-fixing, bid-rigging, and market allocations with competitors, are criminal violations that can result in millions of dollars in fines and restitution and even prison sentences for executives. Winning plaintiffs in civil antitrust actions collect treble damages and attorney fee awards. Even antitrust investigations are expensive and burdensome for companies and employees.
- Many companies face potential price discrimination risks under the Robinson-Patman Act, and their pricing policies pose uncertain risks related to shifting resale price maintenance rules under the Sherman Act and state antitrust laws.
- Dominant firms face additional risks under Section 2 of the Sherman Act, which poses additional considerations for those companies with market power.
A thorough compliance program also can address the antitrust rules governing vertical relationships with suppliers and customers, including dealer restraints, dealer terminations, and non-price restrictions on customers.
News & Events
News
Events
Blog Posts
