Main Content
Blog Post  | 
Trick or Treat? A Scary Tale of a Tariff Avoidance Scam

Sometimes, things really can be too good to be true. Imagine a scenario where an American manufacturing company is approached by a potential international customer/seller of machinery claiming they know the best way to avoid either party paying heavy tariffs. In this recent, real-life situation, the customer explained that the company should purchase a packaging machine and then sell it back to the customer, enabling the parties to avoid paying heavy tariffs. Right away there were several red flags indicating a potential high-risk transaction. Luckily, the company knew to put a call in to their legal counsel to investigate.

Key takeaways from the investigation:

  • Avoiding heavy tariffs. The seller suggested that the company importing the machinery would avoid tariffs, while the seller would be subject to those tariffs. In particular, the seller referenced tariff quotas, which apply to certain types of goods, but not this machinery from China. Although a tariff exclusion could be requested, the company would need to prepare and file an exclusion request, and exclusions are granted on a case-by-case basis. Setting aside the tricky idea that the seller was asking the company to help them circumvent tariffs, the company would need to do a fairly significant amount of work in order to earn the commission being offered to them.
  • Conflicting Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes. The seller provided the company’s legal counsel with the alleged HTS code for the machinery. However, when legal looked at the HTS code more closely, the final 2 digits in the 10-digit code were incorrect. Although some products only have an 8-digit HTS code, there is a formula for converting that 8-digit code to a 10-digit code, which was not followed in this instance.
  • Knowing your customers. One significant item that the legal team had stressed time and time again to the company was the need to really know its international customers. Particularly in a world that is very digitally focused, it is important to know that a seller or customer is who they say they are. A law firm should typically start with running the potential customer (here, the seller of the machinery) through the Office of Foreign Assets Control's (OFAC) sanctions list. When the seller in question didn't appear on the list, additional research was conducted. This led to uncovering that the seller was, in fact, a textile manufacturer, which made the sale of this particular machine unusual. Additionally, not only was the website of the seller not active, but the seller was communicating with the company through an Outlook.com email address instead of a company-issued email address. While it is sometimes true that companies might have unusual methods of doing business and the renewal of a domain can slip, when questioned if this was typical of this seller in particular, the company could not confirm one way or the other. Also of concern was the seller's "generous" offer to handle the customs and entry of the machine into the United States, despite being a Chinese entity.

Overall, engaging in this unconventional transaction would involve putting a lot of trust in a seller who was hardly known by the company and with whom they had no previous relationship. On top of everything else, the company's role as the importer of record also posed a potential liability risk.

Once presented with the above findings and red flags, the company was urged to try to contact the seller via telephone to clear things up. In doing this, the company successfully avoided this "opportunity," which turned out to be a scam.

When it comes to international trade and heavy tariffs, a company's best bet is to follow the right protocols and call on your legal counsel if something doesn't seem quite right.

The attorneys at Calfee, Halter and Griswold are happy to answer any questions your company might have when it comes to import/export and tariff concerns.


Calfee Connections blogs, vlogs, and other educational content are intended to inform and educate readers about legal developments and are not intended as legal advice for any specific individual or specific situation. Please consult with your attorney regarding any legal questions you may have. With regard to all content including case studies or descriptions, past outcomes do not predict future results. The opinions expressed may not necessarily reflect the viewpoints of all attorneys and professionals of Calfee, Halter & Griswold LLP or its subsidiary, Calfee Strategic Solutions, LLC.

Non-legal business services are provided by Calfee Strategic Solutions, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Calfee, Halter & Griswold. Calfee Strategic Solutions is not a law firm and does not provide legal services to clients. Although many of the professionals in Calfee’s Government Relations and Legislation group and Investment Management group are attorneys, the non-licensed professionals in this group are not authorized to engage in the practice of law. Accordingly, our non-licensed professionals’ advice should not be regarded as legal advice, and their services should not be considered the practice of law.

Updates related to all government assistance/incentive programs are provided with the most current information made available to Calfee at the time of publication. Clarifications and further guidance may be disseminated by government authorities on an ongoing basis. All information should be reaffirmed prior to the submission of any application and/or program participation.


Subscribe

Recent Posts

Archives

Jump to Page